Trial lecture
The trial lecture will be held from 10-10.45.
Title: "What does the ‘psychosocial environment’ replace/displace historically in Norwegian schools, and how can we understand this shift?"
Public defence
The candidate will defend her thesis at 12.15.
Ordinary opponents
- First opponent: Rachel Thomson, Professor, School of Education and Social Work, University of Sussex
- Second opponent: Monika Bærøe Nerland, Professor, Department of Education, University of Oslo
- Chair of the committee: Knut Ove Æsøy, Professor, Department of Primary and Secondary Teacher Education, Oslo Metropolitan University
Leader of the public defence
Sølvi Mausethagen, Vice-Dean of Research and Development, Faculty of Teacher Education and International Studies, Oslo Metropolitan University
Supervisors
- Main supervisor: Øyvind Førland Standal, Professor, Department of Primary and Secondary Teacher Education, Oslo Metropolitan University
- Co-supervisor: Jette Kofoed, Associate Professor, Danish School of Education, Aarhus University
Summary
The study provides a descriptive and analytical account of the emergence of the interdisciplinary term psychosocial in Norwegian education. Exploring the psychosocial as a category of knowledge, Mathias examines the epistemic practices, objects, and processes of the psychosocial in educational policy and teacher education, and in relation to the dynamics of contemporary knowledge societies. One contemporary phenomenon highlighted in the study is therapeutic culture, where ideas and theories from the field of psychology spill over its disciplinary boundaries into a range of different social fields.
The main research question for the thesis is twofold: How does the psychosocial emerge as a category of knowledge in Norwegian education (as demonstrated in educational policy and teacher education), and how does it relate to therapeutic culture and the dynamics of contemporary knowledge society?
The thesis presents a comprehensive view of the psychosocial as a category of knowledge that blends expertise with popular culture as well as instrumentalism and emotionalism. It argues that the psychosocial shapes teachers’ professional mandates towards therapeutic cultural characteristics, practices, and values. It also critically discusses how the psychosocial as a category of knowledge contributes to the fragmentation of teachers’ shared knowledge base through its ambivalence and boundlessness, its internalisation and individualisation of knowledge, its emotional style, and its importation of knowledge from disciplines traditionally concerned with patients rather than pupils.
Overall, the dissertation contributes to the growing literature that explores and critically engages with therapeutic culture in education and the study of teachers’ knowledge in relation to the dynamics of contemporary knowledge societies.
